Speed Test Picture Match (STPM) - 2025

1. Task Description

  • STPM (Speed Test Picture Match) is a brief pre-test warm-up that captures baseline responding speed. Students tap the matching picture as quickly as possible across a series of simple visual matching items.
  • Baseline timed responding: Establishes a student’s general speed of responding to timed items before substantive assessment begins
  • Warm-up function: Typically administered first or second in the battery to help students settle into the testing environment
  • Processing speed indicator: Captures general timed responding speed / processing-speed-plus-attention
  • Not a pure motor measure: Research and data analysis below shows non-trivial correlation with maths performance, suggesting STPM captures more than just device familiarity

2. Data & Scoring Conventions

Filters Applied

  • Attempted only: is_attempted == TRUE
  • Exclude practice: is_practice != TRUE
  • Exclude ABR forms: is_abr == FALSE

Response Time Handling

  • Floor at 0.5s: Applied before log transform to avoid log(0) issues
  • Pause exclusion: Items with RT >60s excluded from speed calculations (retained for accuracy)
  • Medians used: Robust to outliers, no hard cap needed for main statistics
  • Log transform: Used for distributions and correlations to reduce skew

Metrics Reported

Metric Description
median_rt_sec Median response time per item (seconds)
rcpm Responses Correct Per Minute
accuracy Proportion correct (should be near-ceiling for STPM)
log_median_rt Log-transformed median RT for correlations

3. Coverage & Administration

Term Year Level Students with STPM Total Students Coverage (%) Items (min/median/max)
Term 1 Foundation 2504 2517 99.5 1 / 20 / 20
Term 1 Year 1 2428 2430 99.9 1 / 20 / 20
Term 3 Foundation 1444 1446 99.9 1 / 9 / 9
Term 3 Year 1 1503 1508 99.7 1 / 9 / 9
Term 4 Foundation 1097 1099 99.8 1 / 9 / 9
Term 4 Year 1 1067 1070 99.7 1 / 9 / 9
NoteItem Counts by Term

STPM item counts differ across terms:

  • Term 1: Typically 20 items (full battery)
  • Terms 3 & 4: Typically 9 items (reduced battery)

4. STPM Distributions

4.1 Histograms of Per-Student Median RT

4.2 Violin + Boxplots

4.3 Extreme Pause Summary

Student Median RT Percentiles (sec)
Extreme Pauses
Term Year Level N p50 p75 p90 p95 p99 % with any item >30s % with any item >60s
Term 1 Foundation 2504 3 4 5.0 6 10.0 26.4 10.7
Term 1 Year 1 2428 2 3 3.5 4 5.5 22.2 8.4
Term 3 Foundation 1444 3 4 5.5 7 11.0 24.7 7.6
Term 3 Year 1 1503 2 3 4.0 4 6.0 13.9 2.5
Term 4 Foundation 1097 3 3 4.0 5 7.0 17.7 3.7
Term 4 Year 1 1067 2 2 3.0 3 5.0 16.2 6.8
NoteUnderstanding the Metrics

Percentile columns (p50-p99): These show the distribution of each student’s median RT across their STPM items. For example, p90 = 4.5s means 10% of students have a median item RT above 4.5 seconds.

Pause columns: These show the percentage of students with any single item exceeding the threshold. A student can have a median RT of 2 seconds but still have one 35-second pause—medians are resistant to outliers.

4.4 STPM Speed vs Timed-Maths Speed

This section examines the relationship between STPM responding speed and responding speed on timed maths tasks. A strong correlation would indicate that STPM captures a general responding speed factor that transfers to maths tasks.

5. Within-Test Warm-Up Effects

This section examines whether early STPM items show different response patterns compared to later items, suggesting a “settling in” period.

NoteWarm-Up Pattern Interpretation
  • Early items (1-3) often show slightly elevated RT as students settle in
  • Response times typically stabilise after the first few items
  • This pattern supports placing STPM early in the battery as a warm-up

6. Reliability

This section examines whether STPM provides consistent measurement of responding speed.

Split-half reliability measures internal consistency: if we randomly split the STPM items into two halves, do they rank students similarly? High reliability (>0.80) indicates the task measures a stable characteristic rather than random noise.

Rank-order stability examines whether students who are fast/slow relative to peers at one time point remain so at another. This is NOT classical test-retest reliability, as genuine improvement over time is expected.

6.1 Split-Half Reliability

Term Year Level N Students Mean r (half) Reliability (S-B)
Term 1 Foundation 2327 0.735 0.847
Term 1 Year 1 2366 0.682 0.811
Term 4 Foundation 1085 0.330 0.496
Term 4 Year 1 1049 0.274 0.430
Term 3 Foundation 1385 0.384 0.555
Term 3 Year 1 1480 0.322 0.487
Based on 100 random splits with Spearman-Brown correction. Near-complete sessions only.

6.2 Rank-Order Stability Across Terms

Comparison Year Level N Correlation (r) Mean Difference (log RT)
T1 vs T3 Foundation 1296 0.494 -0.088
T1 vs T3 Year 1 1363 0.461 -0.052
T3 vs T4 Foundation 820 0.432 -0.180
T3 vs T4 Year 1 819 0.456 -0.161
Negative mean difference indicates faster responding at later term. Based on students with valid STPM at both time points.

NoteStability Interpretation
  • Moderate-to-strong correlations indicate rank-order stability (students who are fast/slow relative to peers tend to remain so)
  • Negative mean differences reflect expected improvement over time (faster responding at later terms)
  • This is not classical test-retest reliability, as genuine change is expected

7. Relationship to Maths Performance

This section examines how STPM speed relates to performance on timed maths probes.

7.1 STPM Speed vs Timed-Maths Accuracy

7.2 STPM Speed vs Timed-Maths Speed

7.3 Correlation Summary by Probe Group

Term Year Level Probe Group N r (Accuracy) r (Speed)
Term 1 Foundation MC 2482 -0.22 0.52
Term 1 Foundation MQ 2486 -0.08 0.55
Term 1 Foundation Missing Number 2413 -0.21 0.28
Term 1 Year 1 Arithmetic 2360 -0.12 0.46
Term 1 Year 1 MC 2420 -0.18 0.42
Term 1 Year 1 Missing Number 2406 -0.12 0.30
Term 3 Foundation MC 1428 -0.17 0.48
Term 3 Foundation MQ 1430 0.02 0.44
Term 3 Foundation Missing Number 1414 -0.20 0.28
Term 3 Year 1 Arithmetic 1489 -0.16 0.41
Term 3 Year 1 MC 1493 -0.21 0.41
Term 3 Year 1 Missing Number 1488 -0.15 0.34
Term 4 Foundation MC 1092 -0.03 0.37
Term 4 Foundation MQ 1090 0.00 0.42
Term 4 Foundation Missing Number 1073 -0.10 0.34
Term 4 Year 1 Arithmetic 1064 -0.15 0.34
Term 4 Year 1 MC 1066 -0.18 0.40
Term 4 Year 1 Missing Number 1066 -0.12 0.34
NoteReading the Correlations

Correlations between STPM log(RT) and task-specific metrics. Negative r with accuracy expected (slower STPM → lower accuracy). Positive r with speed expected (slower STPM → slower maths RT).

ImportantKey Finding

STPM correlates with both maths speed AND maths accuracy within each term. This is NOT just “device familiarity” - it captures processing speed relevant to fluency. This supports the research note conclusion: don’t treat STPM as pure motor.

8. “Don’t Over-Correct” Illustration

This section illustrates why mechanically residualising maths speed by STPM can change what the metric measures.

CautionInterpretation Caveat

This illustration shows correlation patterns, not causal effects.

The residualised metric is a relative speed signal, not “maths fluency net of device skill”:

  • “Faster-than-expected given STPM” may reflect rushing/guessing rather than greater fluency
  • The relationship between speed and accuracy may weaken or reverse after adjustment
  • Mechanically subtracting STPM changes what the metric measures

Takeaway: Use STPM as context for interpretation, not as an automatic correction factor.

9. STPM Accuracy Diagnostic

STPM accuracy should be near-ceiling for most students. Low accuracy may indicate:

  • Misunderstanding of the task
  • Attention or engagement issues
  • Possible validity concerns for the session
Flag Thresholds by Term
Term Typical Items Threshold Interpretation
T1 20 <0.9 >=3 errors
T1 20 <0.8 >=5 errors
T3/T4 9 <0.9 >=2 errors
T3/T4 9 <0.8 >=2 errors

Term Year Level N % OK % Not Near Ceiling % Very Low
Term 1 Foundation 2492 96.1 2.2 1.6
Term 1 Year 1 2427 98.5 0.7 0.8
Term 3 Foundation 1430 94.0 5.0 1.0
Term 3 Year 1 1501 94.9 4.3 0.9
Term 4 Foundation 1095 94.3 4.2 1.5
Term 4 Year 1 1065 96.6 3.1 0.3

9.1 STPM Accuracy and Maths Performance

Do students with low STPM accuracy show different patterns in maths performance? This could indicate attention issues affecting both STPM and maths, or task misunderstanding affecting STPM validity for those students.

Term Year Level STPM Accuracy Flag N r (Maths Acc) r (Maths Speed) Mean Maths Acc (%)
Term 1 Foundation Not Near Ceiling (80-90%) 55 -0.02 0.68 75.7
Term 1 Foundation OK (>=90%) 2389 -0.22 0.63 83.2
Term 1 Foundation Very Low (<80%) 40 -0.21 0.09 67.2
Term 1 Year 1 Not Near Ceiling (80-90%) 18 -0.31 0.50 80.8
Term 1 Year 1 OK (>=90%) 2389 -0.19 0.50 85.0
Term 1 Year 1 Very Low (<80%) 19 -0.27 0.50 65.7
Term 3 Foundation Not Near Ceiling (80-90%) 71 -0.13 0.59 84.8
Term 3 Foundation OK (>=90%) 1344 -0.19 0.53 89.8
Term 3 Foundation Very Low (<80%) 13 -0.08 0.20 77.3
Term 3 Year 1 Not Near Ceiling (80-90%) 64 -0.46 0.27 83.6
Term 3 Year 1 OK (>=90%) 1420 -0.20 0.49 89.5
Term 3 Year 1 Very Low (<80%) 13 -0.01 0.04 71.2
Term 4 Foundation Not Near Ceiling (80-90%) 46 -0.09 0.44 87.7
Term 4 Foundation OK (>=90%) 1033 -0.05 0.48 91.2
Term 4 Foundation Very Low (<80%) 16 0.32 0.47 73.1
Term 4 Year 1 Not Near Ceiling (80-90%) 33 -0.17 0.30 83.5
Term 4 Year 1 OK (>=90%) 1029 -0.18 0.46 90.5
Term 4 Year 1 Very Low (<80%) 3 -0.65 0.23 55.7

NoteInterpretation

Students flagged for low STPM accuracy typically show:

  • Lower maths accuracy: Suggesting the attention/comprehension issues affecting STPM also impact maths performance
  • Similar or weaker STPM-maths correlations: The relationship between STPM speed and maths may be attenuated in these groups

This supports using the STPM accuracy flag as a validity indicator for the session, rather than just filtering these students out.

10. Consultant Interpretation Guidance

Tip1. Use STPM as Context, Not Automatic Correction
  • Very slow STPM = possible device/attention/motor constraints
  • Very low STPM accuracy = attention/comprehension concern
  • Consider re-check if student is borderline risk + extreme STPM values
Tip2. Flag, Don’t Adjust

If a student is “high risk by fluency” but also in the lowest decile on STPM speed, add an interpretation note:

“Low fluency, but unusually slow baseline responding - consider device familiarity”

If low STPM accuracy:

“Baseline task accuracy suggests possible attention/comprehension issues”

Warning3. What STPM is NOT
  • Not a “correction factor” to subtract from maths RT
  • Not a pure motor measure - correlates with maths performance
  • Not a reason to dismiss fluency concerns - use for context only

11. Downloads

Download STPM Student Summary (CSV)

Download Fields

Field Description
student_id Unique student identifier
exam_group Assessment cohort
term Assessment term (1, 3, or 4)
year_level Foundation or Year 1
n_items_attempted Number of STPM items attempted
n_correct Number of correct responses
accuracy Proportion correct
median_rt_sec Median response time (seconds), excluding pauses
rcpm Responses Correct Per Minute
log_median_rt Log-transformed median RT
p95_rt_sec 95th percentile RT
max_rt_sec Maximum RT
n_pauses_30s Count of items with RT >30s
n_pauses_60s Count of items with RT >60s
n_errors Number of incorrect responses
stpm_accuracy_flag “ok”, “not_near_ceiling”, or “very_low” (NA if <5 items)